
\begin{minipage}[t]{8in}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
Bool  & operator()\index{ListIterator!operator()} (Item\& i)
\end{tabular}\\


 \parbox[b]{2in} \ \ 
\begin{minipage}[t]{4in}Set i equal to next item in reverse order in list.
False is returned if there is no next item.
I DO NOT LIKE THIS SYNTAX - WHY IS IT GOOD??  WHY NOT NEXT? \end{minipage}
\end{minipage}
\vspace{0.2in}


\begin{minipage}[t]{8in}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
void  & initialize\index{ListIterator!initialize}()
\end{tabular}\\
 
 \parbox[b]{2in} \ \ 
\begin{minipage}[t]{4in}Set current node to the initial element in the
list iterator.  THIS NAME HAS BEEN CHANGED\end{minipage}
\end{minipage}
\vspace{0.2in}


\begin{minipage}[t]{8in}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
Link$<$Item$>$*  & current\index{ListIterator!current}()
\end{tabular}\\
 
 \parbox[b]{2in} \ \ 
\begin{minipage}[t]{4in}Return a pointer to the current item.\end{minipage}
\end{minipage}
\vspace{0.2in}


\begin{minipage}[t]{8in}
\begin{tabular}{ll}
void   & jump\index{ListIterator!jump}(Link$<$Item$>$* passed\_link)
\end{tabular}\\


 \parbox[b]{2in} \ \ 
\begin{minipage}[t]{4in}Change the current item to passed\_link, ie. jump to a new point in the list.
  THIS NAME HAS BEEN CHANGED\end{minipage}
\end{minipage}
\vspace{0.2in}


